×
How It Works About Us Media Inquiries Contact Terms of Service Privacy Supporters Our Blog
F98101e5a193d4bf7b47bf3e7422a789?d=mm Ronald Paulinski

Proposed Nov. 16, 2018

97138814f711ba3fe3fa4123e8332f7d

The Problem: Voter’s have been electing candidates into the most powerful positions in the world, without comprehensive candidate background checks. Anyone can run for a political office (that’s good), including for President of the United States, while only providing the electorate with age, residency, and citizenship information. SCOTUS ruled that even requiring tax returns would be unconstitutional. (That’s crazy)  Some candidates are corrupt and there's little public background information available about them. Millions of other jobs require background checks - even school bus drivers. 1.2 million of those jobs require Top Secret Clearance background checks. Voters, more than any employer, should know that candidates are being properly vetted. For powerful elected positions proper vetting should be comparable to Top Secret Clearance background checks. Voting without proper vetting is wrong, and it’s irresponsibly dangerous. It would only take one corrupt official to destroy our democratic system. Other than seeking a constitutional amendment (at best would take years to accomplish) there seemed to be no solution to the immediate corrupt-candidate dilemma.     

The Immediate Solution:  “Voluntary" Candidate Vetting would comply with SCOTUS rulings, has compelling reasons to volunteer, and leaves no credible reason not to volunteer.  In late September Senator Wiener's Legislation Director Brady, spent 40 minutes on the phone challenging my bill proposal in detail. Brady then assured me he would be presenting my proposal to Senator Wiener and they’d be making a decision on introducing my bill in early November.  This is now a campaign to get my bill introduced and passed. Vote now.

PowerPoint  Briefing: http://files.ofile.com:/ofile/?controller=Share&action=shareFile&key=939b9fed93c76ce9339b8aa1b2d5c57c


Amendments

There are no amendments yet.

Amend & Discuss

Be the first to comment!

Sign in to comment

Jurisdiction: California

Supporters in Jurisdiction is 1
Lock Policies need at least 100 supporters in the location to unlock the dashboard.
Greenlike nonhoverGreenlikeActive likeI SUPPORT Nationally Reddislike nonhoverReddislikeActive dislikeI OPPOSE Nationally

Engage Elected Officials

Advocate for change. For maximum impact, tweet this policy to the elected officials below once it’s achieved 100+ supporters.